When Bill Morneau said the federal government would spend $4.5 billion to buy Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain pipeline assets and proceed with the contentious expansion, the finance minister was also making a statement about Canada as place to do business.
“It means greater investor confidence,” Morneau told reporters Tuesday.
It’s a point made several times in recent days, a clear sign of the message’s importance — not only to Canadians, but globally as well.
But by riding to Trans Mountain’s rescue, did Ottawa prove it has the conviction to see major projects over the finish line and bolster the investment climate? Or does such an extraordinary step merely highlight the problems that forced a very expensive salvage mission?
“This is an issue for all Canadians,” Perrin Beatty, president of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said in Calgary last week.
What’s the message?
“Because if the message that we send to the world is not to invest in Canada, then what we’re going to see is jobs lost across Canada, tax revenues across Canada lost and investment going somewhere else, including Canadian investors taking their money somewhere else.”
The issue of investment confidence has been a sensitive one in the Canadian oilpatch recently, heightened by the trouble the sector has had building pipelines and the uncertainty surrounding an overhaul of the environmental assessment process for new energy projects.
The federal taxpayer buyout of Kinder Morgan will not help Canada’s reputation as a place to invest, unfortunately – Christopher Sands, Johns Hopkins University
That uncertainty comes at a time when the United States is going all out to attract new investment — albeit controversially — by slashing both taxes and regulations. Earlier this year, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers went to Ottawa to warn politicians that investment in the oilpatch was being lured south.
On Tuesday, however, the Liberal government said it would buy Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain pipeline and related infrastructure for $4.5 billion, and build the $7.4-billion expansion, which could triple the amount of product shipped from Alberta’s oilsands to Burnaby, B.C., for export.
“The most important thing is that it stopped what would have been a disaster for investor confidence,” said Beatty, summarizing the drama the following day. “If it had gone the other direction, it would have had very serious consequences for the Canadian economy.”
Ottawa thinks it can make it work
Many Albertans breathed a sigh relief as the pipeline’s prospects vastly improved — even if B.C.’s resolve to protect its environment hasn’t diminished.
Morneau said it is clear Ottawa has the authority to ensure the Trans Mountain expansion is completed, despite ongoing opposition from the B.C. government.
“That’s why we’re working diligently to remove the investment risks, the politically motivated investment risks, so that this project can go ahead as planned,” Morneau said Tuesday.
Natural Resources Minister Jim Carr told guests of the Edmonton Chamber of Commerce on Thursday that his government’s decision sends a positive signal about investing in Canada.
“We are fully confident in the long term that Canada is very well positioned because of our stable political system, because of our diverse workforce, and because the quality of our product, which is really the envy of the world.”
Stephen Kallir, a senior analyst with Wood Mackenzie, said that faced with one of two outcomes — Kinder Morgan abandoning the Trans Mountain project or Ottawa stepping up to keep it going — Canada got the better result for business confidence.
Some signs of renewed confidence
“There has been some rhetoric thrown around that ‘Canada is closed for business, you can’t invest here,'” Kallir said.
“I think that’s what I just said: It’s rhetoric.”
For positive signs, Kallir pointed to Thursday’s news that Malaysian state-owned energy company Petronas had signed an agreement for an equity position in the LNG Canada project in Kitimat, B.C.
“That wasn’t a small deal,” he said.
But others believe Ottawa’s commitment to Trans Mountain won’t have done much to improve Canada’s reputation, particularly given the extraordinary steps the government chose to take.
Sands, an expert on energy and Canada-U.S. relations, said it is such an expensive option that future investors won’t be confident that they’ll get a similar buyout if their project runs into a similar jam. He adds that the decision doesn’t change Canada’s infrastructure review and permitting processes,
But others are skeptical
“It is like having a kid who hits a ball through the neighbour’s plate glass window,” Sands said.
“It is expensive, but you have to pay to replace it. But unless you straighten [out] the kid or take away the ball, the neighbour will remain wary and the same thing could happen again. And the homeowners association will keep a ginger eye on you and the kid thereafter.”
Canada is overhauling its environmental assessment process for major energy projects under Bill C-69. The ambitious legislation aims to restore trust in the process, while taking into account not only environmental impacts, but also health, social and economic outcomes, as well as effects on Indigenous peoples.
It also strives to streamline the approval process and also provide more clear direction to companies before they spend billions of dollars developing a project.
So even with Ottawa putting its shoulder behind Trans Mountain, the uncertainty hasn’t faded for some.
“In my view, as a shareholder in both Enbridge and TransCanada, I’d be very disappointed if those companies proposed a project in Canada today because they’re just going to lose money — it’s not going to work, it’s not going to get to the finish line,” former TransCanada CEO Hal Kvisle said in an interview.
“The fact that the government has to step in and buy a project from a private sector company that could not have confidence does not give me confidence that other private sector companies are going to have confidence. Maybe if the government buys all these projects we can have confidence. You know, that’s a crazy solution.”
Still, Kvisle said he supports Morneau’s Trans Mountain decision, adding it was the only answer at this point — a sentiment shared by many with a stake in Alberta’s oilpatch.
“There have been very diverse reactions from the investment community and I think that’s appropriate given how kind of ambiguous this signal is,” said Coleman, an energy law professor at Southern Methodist University, who previously worked at the University of Calgary.
Coleman said he would lean toward saying the whole controversy has been a net negative for the prospect of investing in interprovincial projects in Canada, but added that could yet improve.
“That could ultimately be softened, first, if you see B.C. back down a little bit and, second, and probably more importantly, if there are future projects, whether they’re natural gas projects or power projects, that go ahead without a hitch,” Coleman said.
But there’s no guarantee of either, which probably means the discussion about investor confidence will likely continue for sometime yet.